Where the Nexperia auto chip crisis stands now

The logo of Chinese-owned semiconductor company Nexperia was displayed at the chipmaker’s facility in Germany after the Dutch government took control and auto industry bodies raised the alarm about the possible impact on car production in Hamburg, Germany, on October 23, 2025.
Jonas Walzberg | Reuters
Netherlands-based chipmaker Nexperia is at the center of a dispute between the European Union, the United States and China that has nearly caused a crisis for global automakers.
The Dutch government seized control of Nexperia, owned by Chinese company Wingtech, in October, citing national security concerns. This move led Beijing to block Nexperia products from leaving China.
Meetings are being held in Europe on Saturday to try to stem the escalating problem, and Chinese and US officials appear to be clearing a path for Nexperia’s China-based operations to continue exporting critical automotive chips.
But for now, the automotive industry’s supply chain is still uncertain.
conflict Automakers are warning of looming shortages of chipmaker components that are critical to basic electrical functions in cars and difficult to replace on short notice, threatening vehicle production worldwide.
The war comes amid increased scrutiny of China-linked technology firms by Western governments, including the United States, which recently tightened export control rules to limit technology transfers to Chinese-owned entities.
Wingtech, owner of Nexperia, was given the task US blacklist in December 2024 for his alleged role in “assisting the Chinese government’s efforts to acquire organizations with precision semiconductor manufacturing capacity.”
Here’s what you need to know about where the disagreement is and why it matters.
Why are Nexperia chips so important?
Nexperia produces billions of basic chips (transistors, diodes and power management components) that are manufactured in Europe, assembled and tested in China, and then re-exported to customers in Europe and elsewhere. Approximately 70% of chips produced in the Netherlands are sent to China for completion and re-exported to other countries.
The chips are simple and cheap but are necessary in almost every device that uses electricity. In cars, these chips are used to connect the battery to engines, lights and sensors, braking systems, airbag controls, entertainment systems and power windows.
Nexperia had sales of $2 billion last year.
Automakers in late October volkswagenNissan Motor and Mercedes-Benz sounded the alarm potential production disruptions If Nexperia’s chip exports are restricted for a long time.
While automakers often have inventories and alternative suppliers, it is difficult to change supply sources overnight.
What happened and where do things stand?
In September, the Dutch government invoked a Cold War-era law to effectively seize control of Nexperia, amid concerns that its Chinese owner planned to transfer its intellectual property to another company it owns. The Dutch court also dismissed Nexperia CEO Wingtech founder Zhang Xuezhen for mismanagement.
Beijing retaliated weeks later by imposing export controls on certain Nexperia products made in China, escalating tensions and raising fears of a broader supply chain shock. This led the company to tell automakers that it could no longer guarantee materials.
But signs of progress are beginning to emerge.
on friday, Reports said the US plans to announce that Nexperia will continue to ship chips under the framework agreement reached during talks between President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping, citing sources familiar with the matter. And on Saturday China said this will exempt some Nexperia chips due to the export ban. Chinese officials did not specify what these exemptions might include.
“We will comprehensively evaluate the actual situation of the enterprise and exempt eligible exports,” China’s Ministry of Commerce said in a statement. he said.
If the exemptions become final, they could ease immediate pressure on automakers. But the broader dispute over ownership, technology control and security oversight remains unresolved.




