MoD official responsible for catastrophic Afghan data breach that cost billions still works for government

The Ministry of Defense official, up to 100,000 Afghan’s life in risk, is responsible for the disaster data leakage, still working for the government, appeared.

In February 2022, the Great violation took place after sharing an electronic picture containing the names of thousands of people who said that they were accidentally dangerous from the Taliban and that they applied for the sacred area in England.

When someone threatened to publish the entire list on Facebook, the leak, which emerged, asked for thousands of Afghan to be evacuated to England within the scope of a very secret re -settlement plan that the government would cost billions. Details of the leak and subsequent evacuation have been kept under shaking for almost two years due to an unprecedented super -effect.

Now it turned out that the official behind the leak was not expelled for the blunder. When asked if the soldier was still employed by the government, he told the defense minister John Healey News Agents Podcast: “They are no longer in the Afghan summary and finally.”

For the second time, Mr. Healey, who wants the official still employed by the government, refused to withdraw on the issue.

Instead, he added: “This is greater than the actions of a single individual.

“For me, as a defense secretary in this government, my greatest concern and the first focus to the government was to try to comprehend something that was not completely unseen”.

For the third time, journalist Lewis Goodall asked whether he was still a state employee and his defense secretary to avoid responding again. He pushed it for the fourth time: “I will not actually get into personnel issues”.

Again, he asked: “My first priority did not try to make some kind of witch hunt to the defense official who published the electronic table that caused this deep data loss.

“My argument for you is that it can begin today, that the facts of this can begin today and the future of it is examined in a timely accountability.”

Mr Goodall, Mr. Healey, said, “We can assume that no one is fired on the basis of your answers,” he said. When Independent He asked Mode to clarify whether the soldier was still employed by the government, and he said there was nothing to add a spokesman.

In a statement on Tuesday, the Bilgi Commissioner Office, the Ceset “in this case, in this case, no other regulatory action is not required,” he said.

The database contained 33,000 records and more than 18,700 applicants’ confidential information of the Ministry of Defense’s Afghan Re -Settlement Program (Arab). E -mail addresses and phone numbers of the applicants, their fathers’ names and case status.

It also included the names of some British government officials.

It is understood that the anonymous official sends the data set by E -mail while trying to verify information about the applications and believes that the data set has only about 150 lines.

Mode was noticed after anonymously sent to a Facebook group that feared harassment, torture or death at risk of harassment, torture or death if the quotes of the data set were sent to a Facebook group in anonymously in August 2023, and if it could be under the risk of harassment, torture or death.

In September 2023, in the Supreme Court, to reduce the risk of warning the Taliban to the presence of data, the leakage or order of the arrangement is an unprecedented super to prohibit any news about him. Independent It was among the publications insulted after getting information about the leak through investigations about British re -settlement plans.

The ministers continued to create a secret Afghan displacement plan – Afghanistan response way – to help him move from more than 16,000 Afghan to England. About 8,000 more Afghan will reach England.

When the next steps were asked, Healey said that the committees of influential deputies such as the Defense Election Committee should initiate “in -depth investigation ına to those who were“ absolutely ”.

He said that if he was in the position when the data violation was discovered, he thought it would be “very, very possible”.

Senior MPs warned about the precedent given by the superly precautionary measure to cover the data violation. Former Tora leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: um I’m worried that the supervision was applied because the supervised measure was strange, he stopped any free speech or exam in the parliament, and we are still not smarter for who he was responsible or caused. ”

The type of Superinjunction, which was removed on Tuesday, is thought to be the longest time, and the government first sought such a restrictive measures against the media for the first time.