google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
Hollywood News

Setback for Mamata as rebel Ritabrata Banerjee stays Bengal LoP after HC declines interim relief

The Kolkata High Court on Thursday refused to grant interim relief against West Bengal Legislative Assembly Speaker Rathindra Bose’s order recognizing expelled Trinamool Congress (TMC) MLA Ritabrata Banerjee as Leader of Opposition and allowed the Speaker’s order to remain in force until the next hearing.

Also Read: A weaker opposition, a stronger NDA: How the new parliamentary arithmetic could make this monsoon session stand out from the rest

Justice Krishna Rao directed the respondents to file their objection statements within three weeks; The petitioner was allowed to file a response within two weeks thereafter. The issue was listed for re-discussion on July 28. In the absence of any interim decision, Banerjee will continue her duties as Leader of Opposition in the Assembly.

The petition was filed by senior TMC leader Sobhandeb Chattopadhyay, loyal to party chief Mamata Banerjee, who has challenged the Speaker’s decision amid the ongoing internal crisis within the party following its defeat in the West Bengal Assembly elections.

Also Read: Ritabrata Banerjee takes LoP name after 58 out of 80 TMC MLAs support new bloc


Chattopadhyay claimed that after the election results were announced on May 4, the TMC MPs unanimously nominated him as the Leader of the Opposition at the meeting of the TMC MPs held on May 6 and the decision was officially conveyed to the Speaker. The Speaker of the Assembly then requested a copy of the legislative party’s decision and meeting minutes, after which the TMK held a new meeting on May 19 and delivered the decision along with the participation paper.
According to the petition, despite receiving the documents, the Speaker ignored the TMC’s official communication and instead recognized Ritabrata Banerjee as the Leader of Opposition based on the support given by a rebel faction of TMC legislators. Chattopadhyay challenged the decision before the Supreme Court, arguing that the Speaker did not recognize the candidate chosen by the party’s formally elected legislators.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button