Welcome Supreme Court order on Waqf as win for constitutional values of justice, equality, fraternity: Congress

On Monday, September 15, 2025, the Congress claimed that the Waqf (Amendment) Law accepted as a gain for the constitutional values ​​of justice, equality and brotherhood, and has come a long way for the “false intente” underlying the original regulation back.

Jairam Ramesh, the Secretary General of the Congress, said that the Supreme Court’s decision of the Supreme Court’s 2025 Foundation (Amendment) law represented an important victory for the joint parliamentary committee, not only for the parties who opposed this arbitrary law in the parliament, but now ignored but now offers detailed opposition notes.

“Emir is important because the Emir is a long way to get back the naughty intentions under the original regulation.” He said.

Supreme Court Partly Foundation (Amendment) Law 2025 | LIVE

For the opposition parties, consultants said that the law would lead to the creation of a structure in which everyone and everyone can challenge the status of the property before the collection, and that the status of the property would be in such a case.

In addition, he can donate for a ‘Muslim’ foundation that has practiced for only five years.

“The intention behind these sections was always open – to create an administrative structure to keep the voter base inflamed and to pamper those who want to take religious disputes.”

“With this order, the Supreme Court – remained as the powers of the collector, protected the existing vaygür properties from suspicious difficulties and required the evidence of being a Muslim for five years until the rules are framed.” He said.

“We welcome this order as a gain for the constitutional values ​​of justice, equality and brotherhood.”

The Supreme Court has kept the various basic provisions of the 2025 Foundation (Amendment) Law, as those who have applied Islam for the last five years as Waqf, but refused to maintain the entire law.

The head of justice is the temporary order on the subject of intensely discussed, “the assumption is always in favor of the conformity of a statute and intervention to the constitution.” He said.

The APEX court also paused the authority given to a collector to judge the status of the wayname properties, and decided on the controversial issue on non -Muslim participation to the WAQF boards and led the Central Foundation Council that the Council of Foundation should not have more than 20 non -music members and should not be more than three of the State Foundation Board.

The CJI found that the bench was thinking of “Prima Facie challenge” to each section of the new law, and that there was no lawsuit to stay all the provisions of the Regulation. “

“But some parts need some protection,” he said.

The bench clearly stated that their instructions were prima disaster and temporary in nature, and they would not prevent petitions or government from advanced the full arguments about the constitutional validity of the law.

CJI Gavai then referred to the provisions that were intervened or remained with a temporary order.

“The need to be a practical Muslim for the last five years before dedicating a person as a financial foundation (chapter 3 (r)), the provision will lead to the need for use of a force until it remains to examine whether a person is a practical Muslim,” he said.

One of the most important interventions came in relation to the section 3C, which had powers in the government officials determined to determine the status of the Vian property.

The center reported the Law on 8 April after receiving the consent of President Droupadi Murmu on April 5th.

Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha exceeded the 2025 Foundation (Amendment) bill on April 3 and 4 April, respectively.