Congress passes short extension of surveillance program

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., speaks as U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer testifies before a Senate Finance Committee hearing on President Donald Trump’s trade policy on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 8, 2025.
Kevin Mohatt | Reuters
The House and the Senate on Friday approved short-term coverage of a section of federal law that allows warrantless surveillance and collection of foreign intelligence, but its renewal after the end of this month remains in jeopardy.
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 expires Monday, allowing the government to collect communications from people outside the United States, including when they interact with Americans. Friday’s votes extended the program until April 30.
The short-term extension cleared the House only after GOP conservatives introduced separate five-year and 18-month proposals to extend the program early Friday morning.
Why is Section 702 controversial?
Supporters argue that the warrantless surveillance program is an invaluable tool in protecting U.S. interests and thwarting potential threats. The CIA said this month that the program helped thwart a planned operation. 2024 Terrorist attack on Taylor Swift Concert in Austria.
But an extension without changes to the program is opposed by many GOP supporters and Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. It is widely opposed by some Democrats, such as; Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who briefly delayed the short-term extension on Friday but gave up hope of reaching a deal to change the surveillance program more substantially.
“Americans understand that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is abused every day,” Wyden said on the Senate floor Friday, saying a direct extension was unacceptable. “So it is clear that it is time for real reforms to protect Americans from a government they rightfully distrust.”
What does the White House say?
President Donald Trump has called for a clean 18-month extension of the program. His support for Truth SocialOn Wednesday, I talked about the need for robust defenses, especially amid the ongoing war in Iran.
“The truth is, whether you like FISA or not, it is extremely important to our Military. I’ve talked to a lot of Generals about it, and they think it’s vital. No one has ever said, even implicitly, that they could do without FISA – especially right now during our amazing Military Operation in Iran,” Trump said. he said.
What’s next?
The House and Senate left town Friday after advancing the short-term extension. Leaders in both chambers will have to continue negotiations when they return to Washington next week. And they will have to deal with members on both sides of the aisle calling for greater protection of the privacy of U.S. citizens.
The top Democrats on the House Intelligence, Judiciary and Rules committees are Reps. Jim Himes, D-Conn., Jamie Raskin, D-Md., respectively. and Jim McGovern, D-Mass. joint statement They criticized their Republican colleagues on Friday for trying to rush through a five-year extension in the middle of the night.
“By agreeing to a two-week extension of this authority, Democrats have made clear that this must be a truly bipartisan process and that they must work with us in good faith to reach an agreement that brings significant reforms and safeguards,” the lawmakers wrote. he wrote. “And because all members and the public deserve a meaningful role in this process, consistent with House rules, we insisted and Republicans agreed to release the results of our deliberations at least 72 hours before any vote.”
Correction: This story has been revised to reflect Congress’ expansion of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978. In an earlier version, the year of the law was incorrectly stated.



