google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

Australia news live: Nationals set to formalise position after vote to ditch net zero; more rain forecast after storms and hail lash Queensland and northern NSW | Australian politics

Citizens expected to formalize net zero position at party room meeting

Krishani Dhanji

The National Party is holding a special party room meeting this morning after the party’s federal council yesterday removed support for net zero from the federal platform.

senators Matt Canavan And Ross CadellThose tasked with reviewing the Nat’s energy and net zero policy are expected to present their review to the party room for debate this morning.

National senator Matt Canavan.
National senator Matt Canavan. Photo: Mick Tsikas/AAP

We were told this morning that this would take about two hours, and there is an expectation from some in the room that a policy position will be determined today.

A bitter fight has broken out between the Liberal and National parties and conservative and moderate groups over whether the net zero target should be retained, leading to speculation that the Coalition could split.

The problem caused: Barnaby Joyce Leaves national party chamber but party leader David Littleproud He confirmed on Saturday that Joyce was still a member of the party and could return to the party room.

You can follow the background of today’s meeting here:

To share

Update date:

important events

Federal Environment Minister Murray Watt is defending the minister’s current overhaul of environmental laws, including the minister’s power to approve ongoing projects on grounds that are in the national interest, even if they are deemed to cause too much damage to the environment.

Watt is speaking to ABC TV’s Insider program this morning. He claimed the new laws would provide greater clarity than existing legislation on what would be an unacceptable impact on the environment. He said:

Under current legislation, a minister can turn down a project if it is clearly unacceptable, but there is no definition of what this means in current legislation.

What we are trying to do through these reforms is to actually provide a definition of what would be considered an unacceptable impact on the environment and therefore considered a no. The kinds of things we’re talking about in this definition are situations where, for example, something would seriously damage or cause irreparable damage to a particular environmental agent, and some of the examples I gave would be the extinction of thought if someone wanted to mine Uluru, build the Great Barrier Reef, or drive a species to extinction. I think most Australians would say this type of project would not go forward.

To share

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button